Dr. Sherlock

At first, racial discrimination is a serious problem. I hate all forms of it. His academic talent has nothing with his speech. An important role to judge a person’s behavior is good or not is that being focus on what happened (not the person himself). No matter he is the president or a person in poor, Dr. Sherlock is rude to say bad things about racial. No matter where he wants to express his great opinion, all the people will be shame on him. No matter the speech is prepared for a long time or mistake, it is bad to say something without thinking. But, his contribution on DNA is great. So I think he can still have the presentation. So the University of Chicago shows respect on him and rise the “stubborn” to another level.

One is matter of principle; the other one is the policy. Both of them are important. The public opinion is very important to control them. The policy is inflexible. It cannot be perfect. It always has some bugs that people can exploit an advantage. For example, the former Harvard president says that “male is better than female on science and math”. There is no law about this. But he has to take the blame and resign. The public opinion has immeasurable power.

As far as I am concerned, the freedom of speech is relative. There is no absolute freedom. Too free will has a bad effect on public security, even social instability. Looking for the appropriate line to define the freedom of speech is much more important than only engaging in idle theorizing.